ATR2500 USB is a straightforward device that does its job efficiently. With its large-diaphragm condenser and USB power, this is ideal for consumers who want to record in studio quality without the need for additional equipment or technical knowledge. Thanks to its plug-and-play setup, this microphone is ready to use right out of the box and includes accessories such as a table stand, microphone clip, and USB cable.
Since it is a USB desktop microphone, no audio interface is required. Connect Blue Yeti to your computer’s USB port and your microphone to start recording. With its versatility, the Blue Yeti can record voice overs and music without a complex setup.
This article includes the main differences between these two types of microphones and also the main similarities. You will also find answers to some of the frequently asked questions. Follow the article keenly to get every detail on the similarities and differences.
A quick comparison table between Audio Technica atr2500 and blue yeti
| comparison | Audio Technica ATR2500 | Blue Yeti |
| The polar pattern | cardioid | Bidirectional, cardioid, omnidirectional, stereo |
| Bit depth | 16 | 16 bit |
| The sample rate | 48kHz/44.1kHz | 48kHz |
| Frequency response | 30 to 15000 Hz | 20Hz to 20kHz |
| Element | Condenser | Pressure gradient, condenser |
| Features | It lacks a mute button
Lacks a gain control |
It has a mute button
Has a gain control |
| Uses | Best for home studio and field recording | Best for vocals, interviews, field recording, and conference calls. |
| Size and Weight | Light and slim
Easily portable |
Bigger than Audio Technica and heavier
Portable but not suitable |
Differences between Audio Technica atr2500 and Blue Yeti
- Size and weight
If you’re looking for a portable USB microphone that you can take on any trip or travel with you, the Audio Technica ATR2500 is a better choice. This microphone has a substantially thinner and lighter body than the previous model. It features a straightforward tubular design and it features a collapsible stand that is both lightweight and convenient. Everything that you will need to operate with this microphone may be easily stowed away in your bag.
In contrast, the Blue Yeti is quite portable, allowing you to move it around your studio room with relative ease. It is not, however, particularly ideal for a vacation or travel in general. It is significantly larger and heavier. It will take up a significant amount of space in your backpack because of the integrated stand’s large size and weight. This microphone is better suited for use in a recording studio.
- The polar pattern
Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti are both microphones that are used for side-addressing purposes. To put it another way, you communicate into the side of the microphone rather than the top of the microphone. Their polar patterns, on the other hand, differ from one another. Its cardioid polar pattern is the only limitation of the Audio Technica ATR2500 – which isn’t a big deal because cardioid is the most widely utilized polar pattern for a variety of applications.
In addition to cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo polar patterns, Blue Yeti also includes four customizable polar patterns. You can therefore adjust to a variety of recording situations using Blue Yeti. In interviews, the bidirectional pattern comes in handy, and the stereo pattern comes in handy when you wish to record a stereo track. However, in most situations, you will choose to employ a cardioid pattern.
- Sound quality
Both the Audio Technica ATR2500 and the Blue Yeti record at 16 bits/48 kHz. In general, they both have pleasant tones. They are capable of capturing audio with exceptional precision, clarity, and detail. Although the Audio Technica ATR2500 has a lower self-noise output, the Blue Yeti is not significantly inferior. On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a broader frequency response range, which allows them to catch more high- and low-end frequencies.
Similarities between Audio Technica atr2500 and Blue Yeti
- They both have a cardioid polar pattern or pickup pattern
- They have the same bit depth of 16 bits
- They both have a mic stand when purchasing
- Both microphones are too sensitive
- They can both be used in field and studio recording
Pros of Audio technica atr2500
- It has an excellent quality of sound
- It is easy to use as you plug and play
- It cancels the background noise
- It is usually very sturdy
Weaknesses of Audio Technica atr2500
- The LED light does not go off after switching off the computer
- Its stand is somehow flimsy
- It lacks a turn-off button
Strengths of a Blue Yeti
1. Reasonably priced
Without a doubt, the Yeti mic delivers excellent sound quality and value for money.
2. Versatile
The Blue Yeti’s “Tri-capsule array” (three condenser capsules) allows you to record in virtually any situation with any polar pattern.
3. Quiet spaces abound
If you record in a quiet area, the mic will produce high-quality audio.
4. Has essential recording features
Yeti comes with a gain dial, volume button, polar pattern switch, and mute button.
Weaknesses of a Blue Yeti
1) Pricey accessories
It arrives with a desk stand; however, it doesn’t perfectly position the microphone. Additions like a separate stand or shock mounts will cost extra money.
2) Not easily portable
This is a USB streaming speaker, so that a USB cable will be needed.
3) One mic tethered
To use a Yeti microphone properly, you need only one head.
4) Very sensitive
If you bang on the table or use a keyboard, the microphone may pick up undesirable noises. To solve the issue, you can use a shock mounting and a broadcast boom arm.
You might be interested to read also our another comprehensive article of: Audio Technica at2035 vs. Blue Yeti and Audio Technica at2020 vs. Blue Yeti
Frequently Asked Questions:
- What is the use of the condenser in the Audio Technica atr2500?
Answer; The ATR2500-USB, which is advertised as being great for podcasts, home studio work, and voiceovers, looks to be a microphone specifically designed for voice projects.
Conclusion
I suggest Blue Yeti over the other two mics. It has more polar motifs to choose from. The mute and gain controls are pretty helpful. The audio quality is comparable to ATR2500. It has a broader frequency response range so that it can record more highs and lows. Both the bidirectional and stereo patterns work well for interviews and creating stereo tracks.
It is also excellent for roundtable discussions. The different polar patterns allow for clear sound recording. That allows you to distinguish multiple voices around a podium clearly. It captures the sound loudly and clearly, while Cardioid and Bidirectional patterns produce pleasingly precise recordings.
