Most people choose to utilize a microphone when dealing with their audio files or communicating to big events. The Blue Yeti and the Audio Technica AT2035 are two of the most widely used condenser microphones, particularly for singing and voice reproduction. While the Audio-Technica AT2035 delivers exceptional performance and audio quality, the Blue Yeti focuses on versatility and practicality.
The microphones not only provide high-quality sound, but they are also adaptable enough to be used in a variety of settings. For example, one can use both microphones for different purposes, including broadcasting, audio recording, and voice recording. As a result, before purchasing any microphones, it is critical to consider several aspects.
Fortunately, this article illustrates some of the fundamental features of the two microphones. Additionally, it details some differences, along with their associated pros and cons. The article also contains a guide on things to consider when purchasing any microphones and the best answers to the frequently asked questions. Continue reading to determine which microphone is the best choice for you.
A quick comparison table between Audio Technica AT2035 and Blue Yeti
|Comparison feature||AT2035||Blue Yeti|
|Weight||Approximately 0.89 lbs.
|Capsules||Single 22mm mic capsule||Three -14mm Blue’s condenser capsules|
|Warranty||1 year||2 years
|Price||Around $150||Cheaper; costs around $110|
|Cardioid||Cardioid, omnidirectional, bi-directional, and stereo|
|Controls||It lacks a headset volume control and a polar pattern selector||Headphone volume button and mute button|
Differences between AT2035 and Blue Yeti
- Sound quality
Compared to the AT2035, the AT2035 sounds more natural, is essentially flat across the frequency range, and easily penetrates to the lows and highs. On the other hand, the Blue Yeti is considerably more sculpted and undeniably a vocal microphone. As a result, I will give the Audio Technica AT2035 the advantage here, as it’s a more versatile microphone capable of being utilized for several tasks. One may always incorporate some mid-range presence.
- Microphone capsules
The Blue Yeti is equipped with three -14mm Blue’s condenser capsules, enabling the microphone to produce a variety of polar patterns. On the other hand, the AT2035 features a single 22mm mic capsule; little less than an inch. Neither manufacturer provides any information on the capsule’s manufacturing or material composition, which is unfortunate. While the Yeti features three capsules, the AT2035 features a larger one, which results in a more responsive low-frequency response. The primary advantage of these capsules is their ability to generate various polar patterns.
The Blue Yeti costs around $110, which is reasonable given that it includes four polar patterns, a stand, and connects to your computer through USB. In comparison, the AT2035 costs around $150. The Blue Yeti offers superior value for money since the AT2035 requires an extra interface, XLR connection, and mic stand.
- Polar patterns
The Blue Yeti is a four-pattern condenser microphone with cardioid, omnidirectional, bi-directional, and stereo polar patterns. Thus, the Yeti is capable of everything you’d anticipate from a multi-pattern microphone, which makes it highly versatile. The Audio Technica AT2035, on the other hand, is a cardioid-only microphone.
The Blue Yeti’s front panel features a headphone volume button and a convenient touch to a mute button that allows you to quiet your broadcast when streaming or vlogging live rapidly. The AT2035 lacks a headset volume control and a polar pattern selector due to the absence of a headphone output. Alternatively, the Yeti may have incorporated a low-cut filter or a pad toggle.
The total weight of the Blue Yeti is 3.4 lbs. The removable stand accounts for 2.2 lbs. of its weight, but it’s still quite heavy. AT2035 is significantly lighter than AT2035. It weighs approximately 0.89 lbs.
Similarities between AT2035 and Blue Yeti
The warranty period is critical because it enables the user to identify and return defective microphones. Both microphones are covered by approximately one to a two-year warranty, depending on the supplier. Amazon.com and Ebay.com are the ideal places to purchase these microphones. You can place an order and arrange for delivery.
- Approaching sound
Both AT2035 and Blue Yeti are high-sensitivity microphones. They are soundproof in all directions except the frontal, hence are excellent for conversing over specific user applications. The Blue Yeti is distinct in that it includes a variety of audio adjustments that allow users to modify the sound quality.
Audio Technica AT2035
Buying guide for the AT2035 and Blue Yeti
Consider the following parameters while deciding which microphone to purchase.
Purchase a mic that is affordable but of excellent quality. When placing an order, compare the prices of the two machines; the AT2035 is the less expensive; however, it lacks certain additional features, such as the presence of controls.
Select the type of basic design that is most appropriate for your needs. Consider that utilizing a less direct mic closer to the noise source is often better than using the highest sound quality from a distance. For additional information, see the microphones selections explicitly.
- Sound quality
Consider the complexity of the sound produced by the device. Select one gadget that has crystal-clear, high-quality sound. The sound must be both smooth and loud enough for everyone to hear. When purchasing a mic, compare the two and immediately test them before deciding which one to buy.
You might be interested to read also our another review of: Audio Technica At2020 Vs. Blue Yeti
Frequently Asked Questions:
- Is AT2035 superior to the Blue Yeti?
Answer; Given that the Yeti is less expensive and that the AT2035 requires the purchase of an interface, XLR cord, and microphone stand, the Blue Yeti is unquestionably the better bargain here.
Buying a microphone depends on your preferences, such as functionality and pricing. The product’s price and its features are associated with the feature’s quality and price. The Blue Yeti features four polar pattern options compared to the AT2035’s, making it a better value for money. The AT2035 has a superior cardioid mode than the Blue Yeti, making it a better choice for streaming and podcasts.
In conclusion, before choosing the microphone to buy, consider the following: Consider the equipment’s cost and quality as well. Also, consider each microphone’s advanced features and pick the most advanced.